TEHRAN - In a note, Kayhan discussed the report of the old American magazine Nation about Iran's missile attack on Israel and wrote: This magazine believes that Iran was the winner of the recent war with Israel.

The details of recent conflicts in the region show that Israel is not victorious of an anti-Iranian coalition, but isolated and alone in the region. It should not be neglected that Iran's missile attack somehow revealed a new military alliance between Israel and the Arab countries. More importantly, some of the Persian Gulf countries that have American bases informed America that it could use its bases for operations against Iran. Tehran had warned these countries that if they allowed America to attack Iran from their territory, they would be targeted. According to Chas Freeman, an American diplomat, Iran has succeeded in neutralizing American forces in the Persian Gulf. As a result, the attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus caused a series of events that led to a new balance of power between the countries. This incident can be called a victory for Iran and Israel must deeply regret its attack.

Iran: Tehran's goodwill to advance peaceful nuclear activities

In an analysis, the Iran newspaper investigated Iran's position on the nuclear issue and said: Iran has said that we have no decision to produce a nuclear bomb, but if Iran's existence is threatened, we will have to change our nuclear doctrine. This positioning has addressed the Zionist regime, but Iran continues to pursue its nuclear activities peacefully. The recent visit of Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, to Iran, apart from goodwill, was intended to maintain the path of positive interaction with the Agency and to prove the peaceful nature of the country's nuclear industry. Despite the disloyalty of the member states of the nuclear agreement in implementing their obligations within the framework of this agreement, Iran has tried to adhere to the nuclear safeguards’ rules and regulations of the IAEA. Therefore, the strategy of changing the nuclear approach of the country happens in the situation that the leaders of the Zionist regime direct their crisis-provoking approach against Iran towards the threat of Iran's land. However, it is expected that Iran's threatening position will be faced with a negative reaction from Western authorities, including the United States.

Sobh-e-No: The strategic consequences of the True Promise operation

Sobh-e-No devoted its editorial to the strategic consequences of the True Promise operation. It wrote: Right action is the introduction of our right attitude, insight, and behavior, and the True Promise operation showed that it is possible to perform a very difficult, complex, and high-risk action without mistakes, an action that had profound cultural and social effects. The second point is the strategic consequence of validating the future threats of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In global equations, the credit of a country plays an important role in determining the position of that country. This credibility played a decisive role in deterrence in the war, so the True Promise operation significantly increased Iran's deterrence power. Iran's action not only restored the national pride of the people and prevented the repetition of the enemy's malevolence, but also demonstrated the credibility of the Islamic Republic of Iran in repelling threats. This operation changed the position of our country in the opinion of the strategists of the world and proved to them the strength of the will of the Iranian nation and the armed forces in the international arena. Therefore, the "True Promise" operation became the turning point of the developments in the region.

Hamshahri: Canada's new claim about Iran's intelligence services

In a commentary, Hamshahri dealt with the claim of the Canadian Security Intelligence Organization about Iran's foreign operations and said: This organization claimed that Iran's foreign operations have become more aggressive, bolder, and wider, and the countries of Russia, China, India, and Iran increased their activities. According to this organization, the Islamic Republic of Iran seeks to become a great power in the Middle East and expand its influence to Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and beyond. Iran's foreign operations in Western countries have become increasingly aggressive and widespread in recent years, and have led to the advancement of deadly plots by Iranian military and security agents in the United States, Britain, and several European countries. The Canadian government's propaganda against Iran is while this country's embassy has acted as a spying and sabotage station for the CIA and MI6 agencies during its decades of activity in Iran. Also, in recent years, the Canadian government has served the anti-Iranian policies of the United States and the United Kingdom for negative political propaganda, sheltering terrorists and economic corruptors, and setting traps for some celebrities.